Re: UKIP Candidate
Posted:
Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:55 pm
by Freddie
Here's one for you to get your teeth into....
The last government introduced a Big Brother approach to dental care, forcing the non-democratic mandatory consumption of a highly poisonous by-product from the fertiliser industry upon the whole population by adding very nasty chemicals to our water supply. The local health authorities now pay South Staffs Water to add those nasty chemicals to our water.
Hydrofluosilicic acid and sodium silicofluoride are by-products from the fertiliser industry which normally require a disposal licence, unless poured into our water supply. There is also evidence that radioactive Uranium and Radon are also concentrated in these waste products. Many countries have stopped poisoning their population, but not the UK. The side effects are skin disorders, brittle bones, early death. The latter would help the state pension funding. So, what is your view on fluoridation of the water supply?
Re: UKIP Candidate
Posted:
Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:12 pm
by Admin
Oh god. Really? <facepalm>
Re: UKIP Candidate
Posted:
Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:00 pm
by Sniper
I'm so tempted to enter this debate but feel whatever I say will be scorned upon.
With all this talk of By- Products.................is the by-product of drinking Steps Juice (proper beer like) the same as the by-product of drinking Kinver Brewery stuff ( ****???) ????
Re: UKIP Candidate
Posted:
Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:30 pm
by Admin
Actually Paul, I'd prefer a comment on this :
http://liberalconspiracy.org/2013/01/08 ... -marriage/Which is actually a more interesting subject. What's your view? This could have an effect on my actual voting preference.